| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1987:G000186.19870624 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 24 June 1987 | ||||||||
| Case number: | G 0001/86 | ||||||||
| Referral: | T 0110/85 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 79890023.9 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | E21C 35/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | DE | ||||||||
| Distribution: | |||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Voest Alpine | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | EBA | ||||||||
| Headnote: | Article 122 EPC is not to be interpreted as being applicable only to the applicant and patent proprietor. An appellant as opponent may have his rights re-established under Article 122 EPC if he has failed to observe the time limit for filing the statement of grounds of appeal. | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Re-establishment of rights of appellant as opponent Time limit for filing grounds of appeal Grounds of appeal/time limit for filing |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: | |||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/g860001ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
68 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPC Articles
EPO Guidelines - E General Procedural Matters
Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)