Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of /home/patently/domains/xepc.eu/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of /home/patently/domains/xepc.eu/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of /home/patently/domains/xepc.eu/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).

T 1171/13 () of 1.10.2015

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2015:T117113.20151001

Date of decision:

01 October 2015

Case number:

T 1171/13

Application number:

IPC class:

C22C 29/08
B22F 3/10

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

D

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 468Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

Cemented carbide, coated cemented carbide member and production processes of the same

Applicant name:

Tungaloy Corporation

Opponent name:

Sandvik Intellectual Property AB

Board:

3.2.08

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

European Patent Convention Art 54
European Patent Convention Art 56
European Patent Convention Art 108
European Patent Convention Art 122
European Patent Convention R 126(2)
European Patent Convention R 134(1)
European Patent Convention R 101(1)
European Patent Convention R 136
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13

Keywords:

Re-establishment of rights - all due care (yes)
Novelty
Inventive step

Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:

G 0001/86
J 0005/80
J 0031/90
J 0003/93
T 0429/90
T 0828/94
T 0949/94
T 1062/96
T 0335/06
T 1465/07
T 0836/09

Citing decisions:

-

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t131171eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

22 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

X A.54 EPC Novelty

X A.56 EPC Inventive step

X A.108 EPC Time limit and form

X A.122 EPC Re-establishment of rights

EPC Implementing Rules

X R.101 EPC Rejection of the appeal as inadmissible

X R.126 EPC Notification by postal services

X R.134 EPC Extension of periods

X R.136 EPC Re-establishment of rights

Case Law Book: III Amendments

X CLR III E 5.4 Isolated mistake within a satisfactory system for monitoring time limits or for processing mail

X CLR III E 5.4.4.A Cross-check should be independent in a large firm

X CLR III E 5.5.4.A Introduction

X CLR III E 5.5.4.B Selection, instruction and supervision

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

X G 0001/86 (Re-establishment of rights of opponent) of 24.6.1987

General Case Law

X J 0005/80 (Rest.in integrum/due care of prof.representative) of 7.7.1981

X J 0031/90 () of 10.7.1992

X J 0003/93 () of 22.2.1994

X T 0828/94 (Re-establishment/Philips) of 18.10.1996

X T 0949/94 () of 24.3.1995

X T 1062/96 (Re-establishment/MITSUBISHI) of 11.12.1997

X T 0335/06 () of 7.12.2007

X T 1465/07 () of 9.5.2008

X T 0836/09 (Re-establishment of rights in respect of the time limit for filing … of 17.2.2010