| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1996:T082894.19961018 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 18 October 1996 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0828/94 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 87201558.1 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | H04N 9/31 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Display system | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | NORTH AMERICAN PHILIPS CORPORATION, ET AL | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.5.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Restitutio - all due care - no Restitutio - satisfactory monitoring system - no - no independent cross-check Restitutio - technical assistant not properly instructed and supervised |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
A monitoring system for EPO time limits should contain an independent cross-check to prevent the misunderstanding between a representative and a technical assistant from assuring that a notice of appeal will be prepared and filed on time by the other person. Where a misunderstanding is likely to arise as a result of the two being responsible for the same file, the assistant must have clear instructions on how to proceed. |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t940828eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021