European Case Law Identifier: |
ECLI:EP:BA:2002:T064100.20020926 |
Date of decision: |
26 September 2002 |
Case number: |
T 0641/00 |
Application number: |
92907791.5 |
IPC class: |
H04Q 7/20
H04B 7/26 |
Language of proceedings: |
EN |
Distribution: |
A |
Download and more information: |
|
Title of application: |
Method in mobile telephone systems in which a subscriber identity module (SIM) is allocated at least two identities which are selectively activated by the user |
Applicant name: |
COMVIK GSM AB |
Opponent name: |
DeTeMobil Deutsche Telekom MobilNet GmbH
GIESECKE & DEVRIENT GmbH |
Board: |
3.5.01 |
Headnote: |
1. An invention consisting of a mixture of technical and non-technical features and having technical character as a whole is to be assessed with respect to the requirement of inventive step by taking account of all those features which contribute to said technical character whereas features making no such contribution cannot support the presence of inventive step.
2. Although the technical problem to be solved should not be formulated to contain pointers to the solution or partially anticipate it, merely because some feature appears in the claim does not automatically exclude it from appearing in the formulation of the problem. In particular where the claim refers to an aim to be achieved in a non-technical field, this aim may legitimately appear in the formulation of the problem as part of the framework of the technical problem that is to be solved, in particular as a constraint that has to be met. |
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
Keywords: |
Inventive step (no)
Problem-and-solution approach: treatment of non-technical aspects |
Catchwords: |
-
|
Cited decisions: |
|
Citing decisions: |
|
139 references found.
Click
X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.
EPO Guidelines - G Patentability
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Offical Journal of the EPO
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Case Law Book: I Patentability
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Case Law of the Enlarged Board
Loading...
General Case Law
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...