| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2003:T064300.20031016 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 16 October 2003 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0643/00 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 93300749.4 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | G06F 15/64 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Image processing apparatus and method therefor | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.5.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Patentable invention (yes) Novelty (yes) Inventive step (yes) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
An arrangement of menu items (or images) on a screen may be determined by technical considerations. Such considerations may aim at enabling the user to manage a technical task, such as searching and retrieving images stored in an image processing apparatus, in a more efficient or faster manner, even if an evaluation by the user on a mental level is involved. Although such evaluation per se does not fall within the meaning of "invention" pursuant to Article 52 EPC, the mere fact that mental activities are involved does not necessarily qualify subject matter as non-technical since any technical solutions in the end aim at providing tools which serve, assist or replace human activities of different kinds, including mental ones. |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: | |||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t000643eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021