| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2002:T066400.20021128 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 28 November 2002 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0664/00 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 92915753.5 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | A21D 6/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Yeast-leavened refrigerated dough products | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | THE PILLSBURY COMPANY | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.02 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Inability of a US expert to be present at the oral proceedings: no reason for adjournment Re-establishment of the appellant's right to file its grounds of appeal (yes): loss of rights was an isolated mistake Admissibility of late filed evidence (no): absence of evidence from a respondent no reason for an appellant, having the burden of attacking an appeal decision, for late filing of evidence Main request, novelty (no): disclosure of starting cells and their conversion into yeast strains is prejudicial to the novelty of the latter First auxiliary request: disclaimer solely based on Article 54(3) EPC prior art acceptable under Article 123(2) EPC - no referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal Novelty (yes): distinguishing functional feature - 1 - |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t000664eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021