| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2012:R000212.20121017 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 17 October 2012 | ||||||||
| Case number: | R 0002/12 | ||||||||
| Petition for review of: | T 1022/09 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 02732216.3 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B65D 1/12 B65D 25/14 B65D 85/72 B65D 79/00 B65B 31/02 B32B 15/08 B21D 51/26 B67C 3/02 B67C 3/00 C12G 1/00 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Process for packaging wine in aluminium cans | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Barokes Pty Ltd. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Sektkellerei Schloss Wachenheim AG/Vintalia Weinhandels GmbH & Co. KG Rexam Beverage Can Company CROWN Packaging UK PLC Prinz Max Emmanuel von Thurn & Taxis Gargantas De Lata S.R.L. Hermann Pfanner Getränke GmbH Aloys, Günther Sektkellerei Peter Herres GmbH |
||||||||
| Board: | EBA | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Petition clearly unallowable[yes]: - First ground of the petition for review: violation of the right to be heard because of the automatic dismissal of auxiliary requests- objection under Rule 106 EPC raised [no]; exception to this rule [no]- clearly inadmissible[yes] -Second and third grounds of the petition: violation of the right to be heard, no opportunity to discuss the Article 123(2) EPC objection regarding Auxiliary Request III; no sufficient time given to the petitioner due to the cancellation of the second day of oral proceedings - clearly inadmissible [no]- clearly unallowable [yes] |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/r120002eu2.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021