European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2011:T102209.20111027 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 27 October 2011 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 1022/09 | ||||||||
Petition for review: | R 0002/12, R 0002/12 | ||||||||
Application number: | 02732216.3 | ||||||||
IPC class: | B65D 1/12 B65D 25/14 B65D 85/72 B65D 79/00 B65B 31/02 B32B 15/08 B21D 51/26 B67C 3/02 B67C 3/00 C12G 1/00 |
||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | C | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | Process for packaging wine in aluminium cans | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Barokes Pty Ltd. | ||||||||
Opponent name: | Sektkellerei Schloss Wachenheim AG/Vintalia Weinhandels GmbH & Co. KG Rexam Beverage Can Company CROWN Packaging UK PLC Prinz Max Emmanuel von Thurn & Taxis Gargantas De Lata S.R.L. Hermann Pfanner Getränke GmbH Aloys, Günther Sektkellerei Peter Herres GmbH |
||||||||
Board: | 3.2.07 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Non-appealing opponent 05 party to proceedings: not necessary to decide (point 1) Admissibility of documents (filed with an opposition) into the proceedings: yes (point 2) Insufficiency: no Lack of novelty: no Lack of inventive step: yes (main request, auxiliary request II) Admissibility of late filed auxiliary requests (III, III amended, IV to VII): points 6 and 8 to 13 |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t091022eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021