| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2012:R001911.20121002 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 02 October 2012 | ||||||||
| Case number: | R 0019/11 | ||||||||
| Petition for review of: | T 0284/10 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 02803716.6 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | F16H 35/02 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Synchronous drive apparatus with non-circular drive elements | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Litens Automotive | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Schaeffler Technologies GmbH & Co. KG PEUGEOT CITROEN AUTOMOBILES SA The Gates Corporation Beetz & Partner |
||||||||
| Board: | EBA | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Petition for review not clearly inadmissible No right to advance indication of reasons for decision List of possible grounds for review in Article 112a(2) and Rule 104 - exhaustive" - "Adequacy of the reasoning of the board's decision; no ground" "Judicial ground of irrationality, known as Wednesbury unreasonableness, no ground Petition for review clearly unallowable |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/r110019eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021