| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2012:R001411.20120705 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 05 July 2012 | ||||||||
| Case number: | R 0014/11 | ||||||||
| Petition for review of: | T 0291/08 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 01918923.2 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C07C 51/47 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Method of removing organic iodides from organic media | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Celanese International Corporation | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | BP Chemicals Limited | ||||||||
| Board: | EBA | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Petition for review - clearly inadmissible Failure to have raised an objection within the meaning of Rule 106 EPC - yes Request for remittal or postponement does not qualify as such an objection No separate objection raised - no deviation by this Board from R 4/08 and established jurisprudence |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/r110014eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021