R 0007/11 () of 5.10.2011

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2011:R000711.20111005

Date of decision:

05 October 2011

Case number:

R 0007/11

Petition for review of:

Application number:

IPC class:

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

B

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 33Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

Method of production of a meat product containing olive oil

Applicant name:

CRETA FARM SOCIETE ANONYME INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL trading as CRETA FARM S.A.

Opponent name:

EDESMA AktG
IFANTIS ABEE

Board:

EBA

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(c)
European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(d)
European Patent Convention Art 113
European Patent Convention R 106

Keywords:

Objection raised under Rule 106 (no) circumstance justifying the exception authorised by Rule 106 (no)
Petition clearly inadmissible (yes)

Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:

R 0002/08
R 0004/08
R 0008/08
R 0015/09
R 0006/10

Citing decisions:

R 0002/11
R 0003/11
R 0010/11
R 0014/11
R 0006/12
R 0003/14
R 0006/14
T 2241/15

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/r110007eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

19 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

X A.112a EPC Article 112a Petition for review by the Enlarged Board of Appeal

X A.113 EPC Right to be heard and basis of decisions

EPC Implementing Rules

X R.106 EPC Obligation to raise objections

Case Law Book: III Amendments

X CLR III G 2.4 Other documents

Case Law Book: V Priority

X CLR V B 3.6.2.A Recognisable immediately as an objection, defect clear and unambiguous

X CLR V B 3.6.4 Minutes as evidence that the objection was raised

General Case Law

X R 0002/08 (Violation fondamentale de l'article 113/VSL International) of 11.9.2008

X R 0004/08 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC/CANON) of 20.3.2009

X R 0008/08 () of 19.5.2009

X R 0015/09 (Schwerwiegender VerstoÃ gegen Art. 113 EPÃ/GLAS PLATZ) of 5.7.2010

X R 0006/10 (Occlusion apparatus/BOARD OF REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM) of 28.7.2010

X R 0002/11 (Violation fondamentale allÃ©guÃ©e de l'article 113(1) CBE/KSB S.A.S … of 23.11.2011

X R 0003/11 (Petition for review/ISHIKAWA GASKET CO. LTD.) of 16.12.2011

X R 0010/11 () of 9.11.2011

X R 0014/11 (Objection under Rule 106 EPC/Celanese International) of 5.7.2012

X R 0006/12 () of 18.1.2013

X R 0003/14 () of 7.7.2014

X R 0006/14 (Schwerwiegender VerstoÃ gegen Artikel 113 EPÃ/SCHMITZ ET AL.) of 28.5.2015

X T 0120/08 () of 14.10.2010