Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).

R 0017/10 () of 15.6.2011

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2011:R001710.20110615

Date of decision:

15 June 2011

Case number:

R 0017/10

Petition for review of:

Application number:

IPC class:

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

B

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 25Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

Microcapsule and process for production thereof

Applicant name:

Kureha Corporation

Opponent name:

Papierfabrik August Koehler AG

Board:

EBA

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

European Patent Convention Art 112a
European Patent Convention Art 113
European Patent Convention R 104
European Patent Convention R 106
European Patent Convention R 107
European Patent Convention R 124

Keywords:

-

Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:

R 0004/08
R 0008/08
R 0006/09

Citing decisions:

R 0014/11
R 0017/11
R 0002/12
R 0003/14
R 0008/17

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/r100017eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

19 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

X A.112a EPC Article 112a Petition for review by the Enlarged Board of Appeal

X A.113 EPC Right to be heard and basis of decisions

EPC Implementing Rules

X R.104 EPC Further fundamental procedural defects

X R.106 EPC Obligation to raise objections

X R.107 EPC Contents of the petition for review

X R.124 EPC Minutes of oral proceedings and of taking of evidence

Case Law Book: III Amendments

X CLR III C 7.10.1 Content of minutes

Case Law Book: V Priority

X CLR V B 3.6.2.A Recognisable immediately as an objection, defect clear and unambiguous

X CLR V B 3.6.2.B Objection raised in good time by persons capable of validly doing so

X CLR V B 3.6.3 Examples of invalid objections

X CLR V B 3.6.4 Minutes as evidence that the objection was raised

General Case Law

X R 0004/08 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC/CANON) of 20.3.2009

X R 0008/08 () of 19.5.2009

X R 0006/09 (Fundamental width of Article 113 EPC/WATTEX) of 3.6.2009

X R 0014/11 (Objection under Rule 106 EPC/Celanese International) of 5.7.2012

X R 0017/11 () of 19.3.2012

X R 0002/12 () of 17.10.2012

X R 0003/14 () of 7.7.2014

X R 0008/17 (Violation of right to be heard/HOLLISTER) of 18.6.2018