Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).

R 0016/10 () of 20.12.2010

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2010:R001610.20101220

Date of decision:

20 December 2010

Case number:

R 0016/10

Petition for review of:

Application number:

IPC class:

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

B

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 41Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

Method of controlling weeds in transgenic crops

Applicant name:

Bayer CropScience S.A.

Opponent name:

BASF SE

Board:

EBA

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

European Patent Convention Art 112
European Patent Convention Art 113
European Patent Convention Art 24(1)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 106

Keywords:

Petition not clearly inadmissible - clearly unallowable

Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:

R 0001/08
R 0003/09
R 0008/09
R 0013/09
R 0018/09

Citing decisions:

R 0008/13
R 0016/13
R 0007/16
T 2023/09
T 1717/13

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/r100016eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

15 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

X A.24 EPC Exclusion and objection

X A.112 EPC Decision or opinion of the Enlarged Board of Appeal

X A.113 EPC Right to be heard and basis of decisions

Case Law Book: III Amendments

X CLR III J 5.1.1 Previous involvement of a board member as a party's representative

Case Law Book: V Priority

X CLR V B 4.1 ‍‍Article 112a(2)(a) EPC – alleged breach of Article 24 EPC

General Case Law

X R 0001/08 () of 15.7.2008

X R 0003/09 () of 3.4.2009

X R 0008/09 (Fundamental violation of Article 113) of 23.9.2009

X R 0013/09 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC/ALCON) of 22.10.2009

X R 0018/09 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC/JOHNSON) of 27.9.2010

X R 0008/13 () of 15.9.2015

X R 0016/13 () of 8.12.2014

X R 0007/16 () of 4.4.2018

X T 2023/09 () of 2.10.2012

X T 1717/13 () of 14.6.2016