T 1717/13 () of 14.6.2016

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2016:T171713.20160614
Date of decision: 14 June 2016
Case number: T 1717/13
Application number: 02011281.9
IPC class: B41C 1/10
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: C
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 439 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: Unpublished
Title of application: Plate producing apparatus
Applicant name: Dainippon Screen Mfg. Co., Ltd.
Opponent name: Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
Board: 3.2.05
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 56
European Patent Convention Art 123(2)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 67
Keywords: Substantial procedural violation - reimbursement of appeal fee (no)
Statement of the opposition division not to accept further auxiliary requests (inappropriate)
Amendments - intermediate generalisation allowable (yes)
Inventive step - main request (yes)
Catchwords:

Inappropriate statement of the opposition division not to accept further auxiliary requests, see point 1.5.

Cited decisions:
G 0007/93
R 0016/10
Citing decisions:
T 1758/15

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t131717eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

5 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

Case Law Book: II Conditions to be met by an Application

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

General Case Law