Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of /home/patently/domains/xepc.eu/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of /home/patently/domains/xepc.eu/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of /home/patently/domains/xepc.eu/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).

R 0012/09 () of 15.1.2010

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2010:R001209.20100115

Datum der Entscheidung:

15 Januar 2010

Aktenzeichen:

R 0012/09

Antrag auf Überprüfung von:

Anmeldenummer:

IPC-Klasse:

Verfahrenssprache:

DE

Verteilung:

B

Download und weitere Informationen:

Text der Entscheidung in DE (PDF, 55Â KB)
Alle Dokumente zum Beschwerdeverfahren finden Sie im Register
Bibliografische Daten verfügbar in:	DE
Fassungen:	Unpublished \| Unpublished v2

Bezeichnung der Anmeldung:

Metallischer Werkstoff auf Nickelbasis und Verfahren zu dessen Herstellung

Name des Anmelders:

Leibniz-Institut fÃ¼r FestkÃ¶rper- und Werkstoffforschung Dresden e.V.

Name des Einsprechenden:

UT-Battelle, LLC

Kammer:

EBA

Leitsatz:

-

Relevante Rechtsnormen:

European Patent Convention Art 112a
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 111(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 113(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 114(2)

Schlagwörter:

Antrag auf ÃberprÃ¼fung - offensichtlich unbegrÃ¼ndet

Orientierungssatz:

-

Angeführte Entscheidungen:

R 0001/08
R 0002/08
R 0004/08
R 0009/08
R 0011/08
R 0003/09
R 0008/09
R 0013/09
T 0506/91

Anführungen in anderen Entscheidungen:

R 0015/09
R 0018/09
R 0009/10
R 0015/10
R 0022/10
R 0006/11
R 0013/11
R 0016/11
R 0017/11
R 0019/11
R 0015/12
R 0017/12
R 0019/12
R 0001/13
R 0003/13
R 0004/13
R 0008/13
R 0002/14
R 0018/14
R 0005/15
R 0007/15
R 0003/16
R 0006/16
R 0007/16
R 0001/17
R 0006/17
R 0010/17
T 1898/07
T 1150/09
T 1938/09
T 0253/10
T 0698/10
T 2561/11
T 0355/13
T 1635/13
T 2122/14
T 0049/15
T 0473/15

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/r090012du2.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

61 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

X A.112a EPC Article 112a Petition for review by the Enlarged Board of Appeal

Case Law Book: III Amendments

X CLR III B 2.3.1 General principles

X CLR III J 3.1 Competence of the board in its original composition

X CLR III J 3.3 Objection must be reasoned and substantiated

X CLR III J 3.6 Dual function as members of the Enlarged Board and another board of appeal

X CLR III J 6.1.1 Previous participation in cases as members of the boards of appeal

X CLR III J 6.2.1 Previous participation in cases as members of the boards of appeal

Case Law Book: V Priority

X CLR V A 1.1 General

X CLR V B 1 Introduction

X CLR V B 3.4.3 No suspensory effect – review of substantive law excluded

X CLR V B 4.3.5 No obligation to provide detailed reasons for a decision in advance

X CLR V B 4.3.7 Parties' obligation to participate actively in the appeal proceedings

X CLR V B 4.3.8.B Grounds not emanating from the board

X CLR V B 4.3.8.C Subjective surprise

X CLR V B 4.3.13 No right to a further hearing at first instance

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

X G 0001/05 (Exclusion and objection/XXX) of 7.12.2006

X G 0002/08 (Dosage regime/ABBOTT RESPIRATORY) of 19.2.2010

General Case Law

X R 0001/08 () of 15.7.2008

X R 0002/08 (Violation fondamentale de l'article 113/VSL International) of 11.9.2008

X R 0004/08 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC/CANON) of 20.3.2009

X R 0009/08 (Fundamental violation of Article 113/SULZER) of 21.1.2009

X R 0011/08 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC and procedural defect under … of 6.4.2009

X R 0003/09 () of 3.4.2009

X R 0008/09 (Fundamental violation of Article 113) of 23.9.2009

X R 0013/09 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC/ALCON) of 22.10.2009

X R 0015/09 (Schwerwiegender VerstoÃ gegen Art. 113 EPÃ/GLAS PLATZ) of 5.7.2010

X R 0018/09 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC/JOHNSON) of 27.9.2010

X R 0009/10 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC/SONY) of 10.9.2010

X R 0015/10 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC/SEIKO) of 25.11.2010

X R 0022/10 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC/ZALTRON) of 7.3.2011

X R 0006/11 (Petition for review/DU PONT) of 4.11.2011

X R 0013/11 (Petition for review/VECTURA) of 20.4.2012

X R 0016/11 () of 23.3.2012

X R 0017/11 () of 19.3.2012

X R 0019/11 () of 2.10.2012

X R 0015/12 (Violation fondamentale allÃ©guÃ©e de l'article 113(1) CBE) of 11.3.2013

X R 0017/12 () of 8.7.2013

X R 0019/12 (Ablehnung wegen Besorgnis der Befangenheit) of 25.4.2014

X R 0001/13 (Petition for review/NTT) of 17.6.2013

X R 0003/13 () of 30.1.2014

X R 0004/13 () of 25.7.2013

X R 0008/13 () of 15.9.2015

X R 0002/14 (Objections to the Chairman and Members of the Enlarged Board of … of 17.2.2015

X R 0018/14 () of 22.5.2015

X R 0005/15 (Right to be heard II/EURO-CELTIQUE) of 29.5.2017

X R 0007/15 (Petition for review admissible but not allowable) of 15.5.2017

X R 0003/16 (Fundamental violation of right to be heard/RHODIA CHIMIE) of 6.10.2017

X R 0006/16 (Right to be heard/CELANESE) of 29.9.2017

X R 0007/16 () of 4.4.2018

X R 0001/17 (ÃberprÃ¼fungsantrag/IFM ELECTRONIC) of 10.7.2018

X R 0006/17 (Petition partially clearly inadmissible and partially clearly … of 28.5.2018

X T 0506/91 () of 3.4.1992

X T 1028/96 (Suspected partiality/DU PONT DE NEMOURS) of 15.9.1999

X T 1898/07 (Interferon Formulations/BIOGEN) of 17.6.2010

X T 1938/09 (Objection for suspicion of partiality) of 2.10.2014

X T 0253/10 () of 16.3.2012

X T 0698/10 () of 27.4.2015

X T 2561/11 () of 4.7.2016

X T 0355/13 () of 18.11.2015

X T 1635/13 () of 21.6.2017

X T 0049/15 () of 9.3.2018