| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2016:T256111.20160704 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 04 July 2016 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 2561/11 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 04732855.4 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | F16L 37/56 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Coaxial coupling | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | N.V. Holmatro | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | HYDRAM | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.05 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Admissibility of appeal 1 (yes) Admission of a late-filed document (yes) Remittal to the first instance (no) Novelty (no; main request, auxiliary requests 1 to 3 and 7) Inadmissible extension (yes; auxiliary requests 4 to 6) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
Meaning of the expression "a request defining the subject of the appeal" in Rule 99(1)(c) EPC (point 2.5 of the reasons) |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t112561eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021