Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).

T 1852/13 () of 31.1.2017

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2017:T185213.20170131

Datum der Entscheidung:

31 Januar 2017

Aktenzeichen:

T 1852/13

Anmeldenummer:

IPC-Klasse:

Verfahrenssprache:

DE

Verteilung:

B

Download und weitere Informationen:

Text der Entscheidung in DE (PDF, 431Â KB)
Alle Dokumente zum Beschwerdeverfahren finden Sie im Register
Bibliografische Daten verfügbar in:	DE
Fassungen:	Unpublished

Bezeichnung der Anmeldung:

SpritzgieÃmaschine

Name des Anmelders:

Ferromatik Milacron GmbH

Name des Einsprechenden:

-

Kammer:

3.2.05

Leitsatz:

-

Relevante Rechtsnormen:

European Patent Convention Art 76(1) (2007) Sent 2
European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a)
Guidelines for examination in the EPO H-V,3(1) (November 2016)

Schlagwörter:

Ãnderungen (unzulÃ¤ssig)
Vorlage an die Grosse Beschwerdekammer (nein)

Orientierungssatz:

Anwendbarkeit des Wesentlichkeitstests gemÃ¤Ã T 331/87 (siehe Punkt 2.2 der EntscheidungsgrÃ¼nde)

Angeführte Entscheidungen:

G 0002/98
G 0001/05
G 0002/10
T 0260/85
T 0331/87
T 0073/88
T 0514/88
T 0404/03
T 0910/03
T 1202/03
T 0308/06
T 0765/07
T 0239/08
T 0681/08
T 1180/08
T 2135/08
T 1003/09
T 1600/09
T 2146/09
T 0207/10
T 0648/10
T 0747/10
T 1643/10
T 2282/10
T 2311/10
T 1840/11
T 2561/11
T 0755/12

Anführungen in anderen Entscheidungen:

T 2095/12
T 0657/14
T 1462/14
T 0046/15
T 1472/15
T 0336/16
T 0422/16
T 0830/16
T 0833/16
T 0838/16
T 1189/16
T 1365/16
T 1753/16
T 2351/16
T 0437/17

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t131852du1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

30 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

X A.76 EPC European divisional applications

X A.112 EPC Decision or opinion of the Enlarged Board of Appeal

Offical Journal of the EPO

X OJ EPO SE 3/2018, p91 - ANNEX 2

X OJ EPO SE 3/2018, p82 - ANNEX 1

X OJ EPO SE 3/2018, p2 - BOARDS OF APPEAL AND ENLARGED BOARD OF APPEAL CASE LAW 2017

Case Law Book: II Conditions to be met by an Application

X CLR II D 3.1.2 ‍‍G 2/98 and the concept of disclosure – interpretation in the same way as for Art. 123(2) EPC

X CLR II E 1.4.4.B Mere aid in assessing the allowability of amendments

X CLR II E 1.4.4.C Decisions criticising the three-point test

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

X G 0002/98 (Requirement for claiming priority of the "same invention") of 31.5.2001

X G 0001/05 (Exclusion and objection/XXX) of 7.12.2006

X G 0002/10 (Disclaimer/SCRIPPS) of 30.8.2011

General Case Law

X T 0260/85 (Coaxial Connector) of 9.12.1987

X T 0331/87 (Removal of feature) of 6.7.1989

X T 0073/88 (Snackfood) of 7.11.1989

X T 0514/88 (Infusor) of 10.10.1989

X T 0404/03 (Doubles detection/CUMMINS-ALLISON) of 12.7.2006

X T 0910/03 () of 7.7.2005

X T 2135/08 () of 15.12.2011

X T 0648/10 () of 11.5.2011

X T 0747/10 () of 13.4.2011

X T 1643/10 (Bus architecture/RAMBUS) of 26.11.2014

X T 2311/10 () of 24.9.2012

X T 1840/11 () of 13.11.2015

X T 2561/11 () of 4.7.2016

X T 0755/12 () of 23.1.2014

X T 2095/12 () of 27.9.2017

X T 0046/15 () of 9.6.2017

X T 1472/15 () of 14.6.2017

X T 0830/16 () of 15.1.2018

X T 2351/16 () of 27.6.2018