Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1445 of /home/patently/domains/xepc.eu/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1445 of /home/patently/domains/xepc.eu/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1445 of /home/patently/domains/xepc.eu/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).

T 0910/03 () of 7.7.2005

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2005:T091003.20050707

Date of decision:

07 July 2005

Case number:

T 0910/03

Application number:

IPC class:

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

C

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 86Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

Insulated modular injection nozzle assembly

Applicant name:

Husky Injection Molding Systems Ltd.

Opponent name:

-

Board:

3.2.05

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

European Patent Convention 1973 Art 123(2)

Keywords:

Added subject-matter: main request and auxiliary request - yes; second auxiliary request - no

Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:

G 0003/89
G 0001/93
G 0002/98
G 0001/03
T 0331/87
T 0802/92

Citing decisions:

T 0404/03
T 0461/05
T 0308/06
T 0681/08
T 1180/08
T 1003/09
T 2146/09
T 2311/10
T 2506/11
T 2561/11
T 1852/13

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t030910eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

15 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Offical Journal of the EPO

X OJ EPO SE 3/2018, p91 - ANNEX 2

X OJ EPO SE 3/2018, p2 - BOARDS OF APPEAL AND ENLARGED BOARD OF APPEAL CASE LAW 2017

Case Law Book: II Conditions to be met by an Application

X CLR II D 3.1.2 ‍‍G 2/98 and the concept of disclosure – interpretation in the same way as for Art. 123(2) EPC

X CLR II E 1.4.4.C Decisions criticising the three-point test

X CLR II E 1.9 Intermediate generalisations

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

X G 0003/89 (Correction under Rule 88, second sentence, EPC) of 19.11.1992

X G 0001/93 (Limiting feature) of 2.2.1994

X G 0002/98 (Requirement for claiming priority of the "same invention") of 31.5.2001

X G 0001/03 (Disclaimer/PPG) of 8.4.2004

General Case Law

X T 0331/87 (Removal of feature) of 6.7.1989

X T 0404/03 (Doubles detection/CUMMINS-ALLISON) of 12.7.2006

X T 0461/05 () of 10.7.2007

X T 2311/10 () of 24.9.2012

X T 2561/11 () of 4.7.2016

X T 1852/13 () of 31.1.2017