Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).

R 0001/08 () of 15.7.2008

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2008:R000108.20080715

Date of decision:

15 July 2008

Case number:

R 0001/08

Petition for review of:

Application number:

IPC class:

-

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

B

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 75Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

-

Applicant name:

Uni-Pharma Kleon Tsetis A.B.E.E.
Other parties:
BIOSPRAY SA
HELP S.A.

Opponent name:

-

Board:

EBA

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

European Patent Convention Art 112a
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 113
European Patent Convention R 104
European Patent Convention R 106
European Patent Convention R 107

Keywords:

Petition for review - clearly not allowable

Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:

Citing decisions:

R 0011/08
R 0006/09
R 0012/09
R 0013/09
R 0018/09
R 0019/09
R 0009/10
R 0010/10
R 0013/10
R 0015/10
R 0016/10
R 0020/10
R 0021/10
R 0022/10
R 0001/11
R 0006/11
R 0011/11
R 0013/11
R 0018/11
R 0019/11
R 0021/11
R 0013/12
R 0016/12
R 0019/12
R 0005/13
R 0006/13
R 0008/13
R 0009/13
R 0010/13
R 0011/13
R 0012/13
R 0013/13
R 0002/14
R 0003/14
R 0005/14
R 0009/14
R 0012/14
R 0013/14
R 0017/14
R 0018/14
R 0001/15
R 0002/15
R 0005/15
R 0007/15
R 0008/15
R 0002/16
R 0003/16
R 0005/16
R 0006/16
R 0007/16
R 0003/17
R 0006/17
R 0008/17
R 0010/17
R 0006/18
R 0007/18
R 0008/18
R 0002/19
T 0857/06
T 0698/10
T 1417/10
T 1378/11
T 1090/18

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/r080001eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

70 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

X A.112a EPC Article 112a Petition for review by the Enlarged Board of Appeal

EPC Implementing Rules

X R.104 EPC Further fundamental procedural defects

X R.106 EPC Obligation to raise objections

X R.107 EPC Contents of the petition for review

Offical Journal of the EPO

X OJ EPO SE 3/2018, p91 - ANNEX 2

X OJ EPO SE 3/2018, p2 - BOARDS OF APPEAL AND ENLARGED BOARD OF APPEAL CASE LAW 2017

X OJ EPO SE 5/2014, p25 - PART II

Case Law Book: V Priority

X CLR V B 3.1 General

X CLR V B 3.4.2 Grounds listed exhaustively

X CLR V B 3.4.3 No suspensory effect – review of substantive law excluded

X CLR V B 3.6.5 Objection could not have been raised

X CLR V B 4.3.2 "Fundamental" violation of Article 113 EPC – causal link and adverse effect

X CLR V B 4.3.5 No obligation to provide detailed reasons for a decision in advance

X CLR V B 4.3.8.B Grounds not emanating from the board

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

X G 0006/95 (Interpretation of Rule 71a(1) EPC) of 24.7.1996

General Case Law

X R 0011/08 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC and procedural defect under … of 6.4.2009

X R 0006/09 (Fundamental width of Article 113 EPC/WATTEX) of 3.6.2009

X R 0012/09 () of 15.1.2010

X R 0013/09 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC/ALCON) of 22.10.2009

X R 0018/09 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC/JOHNSON) of 27.9.2010

X R 0019/09 (Fundamental violation of Article 113/UNAXIS) of 24.3.2010

X R 0009/10 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC/SONY) of 10.9.2010

X R 0013/10 () of 24.3.2011

X R 0015/10 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC/SEIKO) of 25.11.2010

X R 0016/10 () of 20.12.2010

X R 0020/10 (Grounds for review/BOREALIS TECHNOLOGY OY) of 25.8.2011

X R 0021/10 (Violation prÃ©tendue fondamentale de l'Art. 113(1)/BRIDGESTONE … of 16.3.2011

X R 0022/10 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC/ZALTRON) of 7.3.2011

X R 0001/11 () of 27.6.2011

X R 0006/11 (Petition for review/DU PONT) of 4.11.2011

X R 0011/11 (Petition clearly unallowable) of 14.11.2011

X R 0013/11 (Petition for review/VECTURA) of 20.4.2012

X R 0018/11 () of 22.11.2012

X R 0019/11 () of 2.10.2012

X R 0021/11 (Relevanter Antrag nicht entschieden/BAYER) of 15.6.2012

X R 0013/12 () of 14.11.2012

X R 0016/12 () of 15.11.2013

X R 0019/12 (Ablehnung wegen Besorgnis der Befangenheit) of 25.4.2014

X R 0005/13 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC) of 10.2.2014

X R 0006/13 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC/APTALIS PHARMA) of 22.11.2013

X R 0008/13 () of 15.9.2015

X R 0009/13 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC) of 10.2.2014

X R 0010/13 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC) of 10.2.2014

X R 0011/13 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC) of 10.2.2014

X R 0012/13 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC) of 10.2.2014

X R 0013/13 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC) of 10.2.2014

X R 0002/14 (Objections to the Chairman and Members of the Enlarged Board of … of 17.2.2015

X R 0003/14 () of 7.7.2014

X R 0005/14 (Objections to the Chairman and Members of the Enlarged Board of … of 17.2.2015

X R 0009/14 (Fundamental violation of Art. 13(1) EPC) of 24.2.2015

X R 0012/14 (Right to be heard/LG DISPLAY) of 7.10.2016

X R 0013/14 () of 15.1.2016

X R 0017/14 () of 15.12.2015

X R 0018/14 () of 22.5.2015

X R 0001/15 (Antrag auf ÃberprÃ¼fung) of 3.6.2016

X R 0002/15 (Notice of withdrawal/EURO-CELTIQUE) of 21.10.2015

X R 0005/15 (Right to be heard II/EURO-CELTIQUE) of 29.5.2017

X R 0007/15 (Petition for review admissible but not allowable) of 15.5.2017

X R 0008/15 (Fundamental violation of the right to be heard) of 18.7.2016

X R 0002/16 (Antrag auf ÃberprÃ¼fung) of 28.10.2016

X R 0003/16 (Fundamental violation of right to be heard/RHODIA CHIMIE) of 6.10.2017

X R 0005/16 (Petition clearly unallowable) of 24.10.2016

X R 0006/16 (Right to be heard/CELANESE) of 29.9.2017

X R 0007/16 () of 4.4.2018

X R 0003/17 () of 24.5.2018

X R 0006/17 (Petition partially clearly inadmissible and partially clearly … of 28.5.2018

X R 0008/17 (Violation of right to be heard/HOLLISTER) of 18.6.2018

X T 0857/06 (TNF binding protein II/YEDA) of 5.6.2008

X T 0698/10 () of 27.4.2015

X T 1378/11 (Tramadol dosage/EURO-CELTIQUE) of 16.9.2015