European Case Law Identifier: |
ECLI:EP:BA:2016:R000516.20161024 |
Date of decision: |
24 October 2016 |
Case number: |
R 0005/16 |
Petition for review of: |
T 0403/13 |
Application number: |
07700163.4 |
IPC class: |
A61L 24/08 |
Language of proceedings: |
EN |
Distribution: |
B |
Download and more information: |
|
Title of application: |
LAYERED ADHESIVE CONSTRUCTION WITH ADHESIVE LAYERS HAVING DIFFERENT HYDROCOLLOID COMPOSITION |
Applicant name: |
Coloplast A/S |
Opponent name: |
Hollister Incorporated |
Board: |
EBA |
Headnote: |
- |
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
Keywords: |
Fundamental violation of the right to be heard (no) |
Catchwords: |
A party to appeal proceedings should be aware of the methodology established in the case law of the boards of appeal for examining inventive step and should be prepared to submit its relevant arguments in this respect (Reasons, point 18).
A mere subjective surprise of a party in respect of an issue in the reasoning of the decision under review, which the party objectively could have known and on which the party was given an opportunity to comment, does not in itself amount to a violation of Article 113(1) EPC (Reasons, point 19).
|
Cited decisions: |
|
Citing decisions: |
|
20 references found.
Click
X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.
EPC Articles
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
EPC Implementing Rules
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Case Law Book: V Priority
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
General Case Law
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...