| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2012:R001312.20121114 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 14 November 2012 | ||||||||
| Case number: | R 0013/12 | ||||||||
| Petition for review of: | T 0036/10 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 01904673.9 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C22C 14/00 C22F 1/18 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Titanium alloy and method for heat treatment of large-sized semifinished materials of said alloy | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Public Stock Company "VSMPO-AVISMA Corporation" | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Titanium Metals Corporation | ||||||||
| Board: | EBA | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Petition for review clearly inadmissible [no] Arguments not considered: violation of the right to be heard [no] - criticism of the substance of the decision falling outside the petition for review procedure [yes]- petition clearly unallowable. |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/r120013eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021