| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1989:G000188.19890127 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 27 January 1989 | ||||||||
| Case number: | G 0001/88 | ||||||||
| Referral: | T 0271/85 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 79102131.4 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C07C 102/04 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | DE | ||||||||
| Distribution: | |||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Hoechst | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Bayer | ||||||||
| Board: | EBA | ||||||||
| Headnote: | The fact that an opponent has failed, within the time allowed, to make any observations on the text in which it is intended to maintain the European patent after being invited to do so under Rule 58(4) EPC does not render his appeal inadmissible. | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Admissibility of appeal by opponent Silence in response to an invitation under Rule 58(4) Application of Rule 58(4) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: | |||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/g880001ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
55 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPC Articles
EPC Implementing Rules
EPO Guidelines - D Opposition and Limitation/Revocation Procedures
Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)