T 0934/91 (Photographic material) of 4.8.1992

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:1992:T093491.19920804
Date of decision: 04 August 1992
Case number: T 0934/91
Application number: 82306970.3
IPC class: G03C 7/26
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: A
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 424 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: OJ | Published
Title of application: -
Applicant name: Konica
Opponent name: Agfa-Gevaert
Board: 3.3.01
Headnote: 1. Boards of Appeal have the power to apportion and also to fix costs Articles 104(1) and (2) and 11(1) EPC having due regard to Article 113(1) EPC (paragraph 4 of the Reasons).
2. Their decisions are final (paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Reasons).
3. A communication by the first instance despite being entitled a "decision" and having the sole effect of informing a party of the points listed above does not rank as a "decision" for the purposes of Article 106(1) EPC (paragraph 5 of the Reasons). An appeal against such an act is therefore inadmissible (paragraph 5 of the Reasons).
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 104(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 104(2)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 111(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 113(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 63
Keywords: Power of the Boards of Appeal to fix costs
Communications of the first instance
Admissibility of an appeal
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
-
Citing decisions:
J 0003/95
J 0014/00
J 0019/00
J 0009/04
J 0002/05
R 0004/18
T 0678/90
T 0691/91
T 0113/92
T 1063/92
T 0153/93
T 0167/93
T 0230/93
T 0977/95
T 0799/97
T 0042/99
T 0817/00
T 0203/03
T 1181/04
T 1421/05
T 1895/06
T 0212/07
T 0051/08
T 0365/09
T 2529/10
T 0222/11
T 2084/11
T 1666/14
T 0449/15

28 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: III Amendments

Case Law Book: V Priority

General Case Law