| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2009:T005108.20090507 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 07 May 2009 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0051/08 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 05076491.9 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | G03G 15/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Automatic service requests over the world wide web | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.5.05 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Binding effect of a decision taken in the parent application Principle of res iudicata applied in the divisional application Admissibility of the appeal (no) Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (no) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
Subject matter on which a final decision has been taken by a board of appeal in the parent application becomes res iudicata and cannot be pursued in the divisional application. If the statement setting out the grounds of appeal in a case does not go beyond submitting and arguing for a set of claims which constitutes such subject matter, the appeal is not sufficiently substantiated. |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t080051eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
22 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPC Articles
EPC Implementing Rules
Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO 2020, A104 - Interlocutory Decision of Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.01 dated 7 February 2019 - T 318/14