Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).

T 0021/08 () of 2.9.2010

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2010:T002108.20100902

Date of decision:

02 September 2010

Case number:

T 0021/08

Application number:

IPC class:

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

C

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 41Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

Method of separate application of resin and hardener

Applicant name:

Akzo Nobel N.V., et al

Opponent name:

Dynea ASA

Board:

3.2.07

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

European Patent Convention Art 56

Keywords:

Inventive step: no; inventive step must be present over any feasible starting point

Catchwords:

See point 1.2.3

Cited decisions:

T 0606/89
T 0570/91
T 0487/95
T 0710/97
T 0967/97
T 1285/01

Citing decisions:

R 0005/13
R 0009/13
R 0010/13
R 0011/13
R 0012/13
R 0013/13
T 0308/09
T 0435/11
T 0561/11
T 0833/11
T 1677/11
T 1760/11
T 1742/12
T 1747/12
T 1921/12
T 2123/14

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t080021eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

25 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

X A.56 EPC Inventive step

EPO Guidelines - G Patentability

X GL G VII 5.1 Determination of the closest prior art

Offical Journal of the EPO

X OJ EPO SE 5/2015, p80 - Klaus GRABINSKI

X OJ EPO SE 4/2015, p19 - PART II

Case Law Book: I Patentability

X CLR I D 3.1 Determination of closest prior art in general

General Case Law

X R 0005/13 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC) of 10.2.2014

X R 0009/13 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC) of 10.2.2014

X R 0010/13 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC) of 10.2.2014

X R 0011/13 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC) of 10.2.2014

X R 0012/13 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC) of 10.2.2014

X R 0013/13 (Fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC) of 10.2.2014

X T 0606/89 () of 18.9.1990

X T 0570/91 () of 26.11.1993

X T 0487/95 (Schutzhelm/SCHUBERTH) of 7.8.1997

X T 0710/97 () of 25.10.2000

X T 0967/97 (Chipkarte/OVD KINEGRAM AG) of 25.10.2001

X T 1285/01 (AcrylsÃ¤ure/BASF) of 6.7.2004

X T 0308/09 () of 9.2.2011

X T 0435/11 (Data export and import/SAP) of 13.5.2016

X T 0833/11 (Fluticasone furoate/GLAXO) of 8.4.2014

X T 1677/11 ((-)-Omeprazole Na/ASTRAZENECA) of 27.11.2012

X T 1760/11 ((-)-Omeprazole Mg/ASTRAZENECA) of 13.11.2012

X T 1742/12 (On-demand instantiation/RAYTHEON) of 22.6.2016

X T 1747/12 (COMPOSITION COSMETIQUE COMPRENANT UNE SILICONE VOLATILE, UN … of 9.2.2017

X T 2123/14 (Composition cosmÃ©tique dÃ©tergente comprenant quatre tensioactifs et … of 27.10.2016