European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1993:T037192.19931202 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 02 December 1993 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0371/92 | ||||||||
Application number: | 86870088.1 | ||||||||
IPC class: | C08G 18/42 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | FR | ||||||||
Distribution: | |||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | - | ||||||||
Applicant name: | FINA | ||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | 3.3.03 | ||||||||
Headnote: | Payment of the appeal fee does not in itself constitute the valid filing of the appeal. Consequently, where there is no appeal, it is not for the board of appeal to judge whether there has been a substantial procedural violation by the first instance, whose decision therefore definitively acquires the force of res judicata. | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
Keywords: | Payment of appeal fee without notice of appeal - appeal not filed Restitutio in integrum (no) - insufficient care taken in view of the circumstances Valid filing of appeal essential for setting aside of a decision claimed to be void and without legal effect |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t920371ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
40 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)