| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2011:T037711.20111214 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 14 December 2011 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0377/11 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 02028664.7 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C09K 3/18 C03C 17/25 C03C 17/34 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | D | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Use of a photocatalytically rendered superhydrophilic surface with antifogging properties | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Toto Ltd. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | AGC Glass Europe | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.10 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Debit order for the appeal fee no valid means of filing the appeal Requirements for filing of appeal in electronic form the same as in paper form No obligation on the Board to notify the Appellant that the notice of appeal is missing when an appeal fee has been paid |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t110377eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021