| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2007:T109305.20070613 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 13 June 2007 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1093/05 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 97111341.0 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | G06F 7/52 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | DE | ||||||||
| Distribution: | A | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Infineon Technologies AG | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.5.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | If a grant decision is defective, the patent proprietor must consider carefully the nature of the defect and how it is best rectified. If it involves a substantial procedural violation, rectification is possible only on appeal. A request for correction under Rule 89 EPC can succeed only if it is clear that the examining division did not intend to grant the patent in that form - and also in what form it did intend to grant it (Reasons 12). | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Interpreting a decision to grant a patent Correction of a decision to grant a patent (no) Amendments after the communication under Rule 51(4)EPC |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t051093ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
24 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)