T 0850/95 (Correction of decision to grant/US GYPSUM III) of 12.7.1996

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:1996:T085095.19960712
Date of decision: 12 July 1996
Case number: T 0850/95
Application number: 89311913.1
IPC class: C04B 11/024
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: A
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 405 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: OJ | OJ v2 | Published | Published v2
Title of application: Composite material and method of producing
Applicant name: UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY
Opponent name: -
Board: 3.3.02
Headnote: I. In a decision to grant, if the text given for grant is not and obviously cannot be the text corresponding to the real intention of the Examining Division, there is an obvious mistake within the meaning of Rule 89 EPC and the text erroneously indicated can be replaced by the text on which the Division actually wanted to base its decision.
II. The filing of replacement pages for the whole specification should be avoided unless the extent of amendments makes it absolutely necessary.
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 R 67
European Patent Convention 1973 R 68(2)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 89
Keywords: Correction of decision to grant - yes
Reimbursement of the appeal fee - yes
Reasons for a decision - insufficient
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
G 0008/95
T 0546/90
T 0113/92
Citing decisions:
G 0001/10
J 0016/99
J 0025/10
T 0953/96
T 0740/00
T 0282/01
T 1093/05
T 0603/07
T 1349/08
T 1145/09
T 1495/09
T 1869/12
T 0084/16
T 0506/16
T 1003/19
T 0265/20

Source: https://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/advanced-search.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

21 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPO Guidelines - H Amendments and Corrections

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: III Amendments

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

General Case Law