| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1986:T021385.19861216 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 16 December 1986 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0213/85 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 79100533.3 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B22C 1/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | DE | ||||||||
| Distribution: | |||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Georg Fischer | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | If an opposition has been dismissed on the grounds of insufficient substantiation and the grounds for appeal merely dispute patentability without elaborating on the admissibility of the opposition, the appeal is inadmissible for lack of adequate substantiation (in connection with T 220/83, "Grounds for appeal/Hüls", OJ EPO 1986, p. 249). | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Admissibility of appeal - adequate substantiation (denied) | ||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: | |||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t850213ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
47 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)