| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2014:T145811.20141023 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 23 October 2014 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1458/11 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 03010821.1 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B01D 53/94 B01J 23/63 B01J 37/02 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | D | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | NOx storage catalyst | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Peugeot Citroen Automobiles S.A. | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.05 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Oral submissions by an accompanying person in opposition proceedings (yes allowable - in conformity with G 4/95) Requirements of G 4/95 to be met throughout the oral proceedings (yes - duty of the opposition division to ensure) Party's obligation to inform the opposition division that requirements of G4/95 are not met (yes - as soon as it becomes aware thereof) Procedural violation (no) - reimbursement of the appeal fee (no) Novelty - main request (yes) Inventive step - main request (no) Inventive step - obvious alternative Auxiliary request 1 - sufficiency of disclosure (yes) Auxiliary request 1 - amendments (allowable) Auxiliary request 1 - inventive step (yes) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
See reasons 8 to 8.4 |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t111458eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021