Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).

T 1400/11 () of 3.7.2014

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2014:T140011.20140703

Date of decision:

03 July 2014

Case number:

T 1400/11

Application number:

IPC class:

B27D 5/00
B27C 9/02
B23Q 1/54

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

C

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 349Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

Operating machine for machining wooden elements

Applicant name:

SCM Group S.p.A.

Opponent name:

Homag Holzbearbeitungssysteme AG

Board:

3.2.07

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4)

Keywords:

Admissibility of all appellant's requests filed with
the statement setting out the grounds of appeal - (no)

Catchwords:

Reasons, points 3.2 to 3.11

Cited decisions:

G 0007/91
G 0008/91
G 0009/91
G 0010/91
G 0009/92
G 0004/93
G 0007/93
G 0008/93
G 0001/99
R 0010/09
R 0011/11
T 0931/06
T 1685/07
T 0356/08
T 1067/08
T 0144/09
T 0936/09
T 0023/10

Citing decisions:

T 0167/11
T 0169/12
T 1401/13
T 1193/15

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t111400eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

23 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Case Law Book: V Priority

X CLR V A 4.11.3.D Requests not submitted by proprietor in opposition proceedings

Case Law Book: VII Proceedings before the EPO

X CLR VII 1.2.1 Courts of law under the EPC

X CLR VII 1.4 Power to amend the RPBA under Article 23(4) EPC

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

X G 0007/91 (Withdrawal of appeal) of 5.11.1992

X G 0008/91 (Withdrawal of appeal) of 5.11.1992

X G 0009/91 (Power to examine) of 31.3.1993

X G 0010/91 (Examination of opposition/appeals) of 31.3.1993

X G 0009/92 (Non-appealing party) of 14.7.1994

X G 0004/93 (Non-appealing party) of 14.7.1994

X G 0007/93 (Late amendments) of 13.5.1994

X G 0008/93 (Withdrawal of opposition) of 13.6.1994

X G 0001/99 (Reformatio in peius / 3M) of 2.4.2001

General Case Law

X R 0010/09 () of 22.6.2010

X R 0011/11 (Petition clearly unallowable) of 14.11.2011

X T 0931/06 () of 21.11.2008

X T 1685/07 () of 4.8.2010

X T 0356/08 () of 7.7.2009

X T 1067/08 (High-activity phytase/BASF SE) of 10.2.2011

X T 0144/09 () of 4.5.2011

X T 0936/09 () of 1.3.2012

X T 0023/10 (Admission of requests filed with the statement of grounds of appeal) of 18.1.2011

X T 0167/11 () of 22.1.2015

X T 0169/12 () of 20.8.2015