T 0039/93 (Polymer powders) of 14.2.1996

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:1996:T003993.19960214
Date of decision: 14 February 1996
Case number: T 0039/93
Application number: 85304517.7
IPC class: C08J 3/12
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: A
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 1.953M)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: OJ | Published
Title of application: Polymer powders
Applicant name: ALLIED COLLOIDS LIMITED
Opponent name: SNF Floerger
Board: 3.3.03
Headnote: 1. New Rule 71a EPC should not be construed as an invitation to file new evidence or other material departing from the legal and factual framework of issues and grounds pleaded and evidenced throughout the proceedings prior to the hearing of the appeal (point 3.3 of Reasons).
2. The technical problem as originally presented, in accordance with Rule 27(1)(c) EPC, in the application or patent in suit, which is to be regarded as the "subjective" technical problem, may require reformulation on the basis of objectively more relevant elements originally not taken into account by the Applicant or Patentee. This reformulation yields a definition of the "objective" technical problem. The latter represents the ultimate residue (effect), corresponding to the objective contribution provided by the subject-matter defined in the relevant claim (features)(Points 5.3.1, 5.3.2, 5.3.3 of Reasons).
3. Whilst generally accepted definitions of the notional "person skilled in the art" do not always use identical language to define the qualities of such a person, they have one thing in common, namely that none of them suggests that he is possessed of any inventive capability. It is the presence of such capability in the inventor which sets him apart from the notional skilled person (point 7.8.4 of Reasons).
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 56
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 113(2)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 114(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 114(2)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 27(1)(c)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 55(c)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 71a
Keywords: Inventive step (yes) - combination of physical and compositional features not in accordance with the prior art teaching
Problem solution approach - reformulation of technical problem - objective problem
Late filed material confirming evidence previously submitted
Limits on investigative function of the Boards of Appeal
Effects of Rule 71a EPC considered
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
G 0007/91
G 0008/91
G 0009/91
G 0010/91
T 0020/81
T 0013/84
T 0229/85
T 0170/87
T 0246/91
T 0495/91
T 0741/91
T 1002/92
Citing decisions:
G 0002/07
G 0001/08
T 0267/92
T 0739/92
T 0125/93
T 0259/94
T 0303/94
T 0305/94
T 0459/94
T 0552/94
T 0172/95
T 0322/95
T 0393/95
T 0980/95
T 0475/96
T 0426/97
T 0610/97
T 0894/97
T 0176/98
T 1029/98
T 0717/00
T 0845/02
T 0108/03
T 1264/04
T 0083/05
T 1209/05
T 0276/06
T 1397/08
T 0188/09
T 0601/09
T 1312/09
T 0584/10
T 1117/10
T 0270/11
T 0851/11
T 1422/12
T 1932/12
T 0628/14
T 0710/15

44 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPO Guidelines - B Search

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: I Patentability

Case Law Book: III Amendments

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

General Case Law