| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1998:T025994.19980811 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 11 August 1998 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0259/94 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 87110385.9 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C07C 57/055 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Anhydrous diluents for the propylene oxidation reaction to acrolein and acrolein oxidation to acrylic acid | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Union Carbide Corporation | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | BASF Aktiengesellschaft, Ludwigshafen | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Novelty (yes) - features not implicitly disclosed - multiple selection Inventive step (yes) - determination of the closest state of the art - proper comparison - unexpected effect Late filed evidence: admitted (no) - lack of relevance; admitted (yes) - no objection from respondent |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t940259eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021