| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1995:T101693.19950323 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 23 March 1995 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1016/93 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 85304985.6 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B60K 31/02 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Automatic speed control systems | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | ECONOCRUISE LIMITED | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Robert Bosch GmbH | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Late submitted material - evidence admitted (yes) Apportionment of costs (no) Novelty (no) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
1. If it is apparent that a newly cited document is relevant to the decision to be taken it has to be admitted into the proceedings (point 3.4, see also T 0164/89). 2. If the Appellant's reasons for the late citing of a document do not point towards negligence or other circumstances that would amount to an abuse of procedure there is no reason of equity which would justify an apportionment of costs in the Respondent's favour (point 3.6). |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t931016eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021