European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1999:T097793.19990330 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 30 March 1999 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0977/93 | ||||||||
Application number: | 84902632.3 | ||||||||
IPC class: | A61K 39/12 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | A | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | Canine coronavirus vaccine | ||||||||
Applicant name: | American Home Products Corporation | ||||||||
Opponent name: | Rhone Merieux | ||||||||
Board: | 3.3.04 | ||||||||
Headnote: | A product made available to the public is not reproducible within the meaning of decision G 0001/92 (point 4.1) and thus does not belong to the state of the art if the skilled person is not in a position to establish identity of the reproduced product with the commercially available product because the intrinsic and extrinsic features of the product are not accessible and there is a high probability of variation upon reproduction. (See points 11.1 to 11.3 and 12 of the "Reasons") | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Availability of the intrinsic and extrinsic features of a vaccine (no) Inventive step (yes) |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t930977ex1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
10 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)