| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2018:T106318.20181205 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 05 December 2018 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1063/18 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 12756468.0 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | A01H 5/08 C12N 15/82 A01H 1/04 C12Q 1/68 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | New pepper plants and fruits with improved nutritional value | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Syngenta Participations AG | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.04 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Exceptions to patentability - (no) Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (no) Appeal decision - remittal to the examining division Appeal decision - (yes) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
Rule 28(2) EPC is in conflict with Article 53(b) EPC, as interpreted by the Enlarged Board of Appeal in decisions G 2/12 and G 2/13. In accordance with Article 164(2) EPC, the provisions of the Convention prevail. |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t181063eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
29 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPC Articles
EPC Implementing Rules
Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO 2019, A62 - Report on the 159th and 160th meetings of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation (27 and 28 March 2019 and 26 and 27 June 2019 respectively)