| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1986:T024885.19860121 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 21 January 1986 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0248/85 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 82305334.3 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C08J 7/10 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | A | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Radiation processing of polymeric products | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | BICC | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | 1. The provisions of the EPC governing the requirements for patentability and those relating to the extent of protection fulfil different functions. A claim directed to subject-matter which, though coming within the extent of protection provided by the EPC, does not meet the requirements for patentability laid down in Articles 52 to 57, is not allowable. A known product is not rendered novel merely by means of further definition (as a "product of process"). 2. An objective assessment of inventive step starting from the closest prior art implies that the latter has been positively identified and considered. |
||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Product-by-process-claims Identification of the closest prior art |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: | |||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t850248ex1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
48 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)
