| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2015:T206814.20150730 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 30 July 2015 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 2068/14 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 10193245.7 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | G06F 9/445 G01R 31/36 G01R 31/40 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | System and method for displaying battery information | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Psion Inc. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.5.06 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (no) Oral proceedings - change of date (no) Substantial procedural violation - (yes) Remittal to the department of first instance - special reasons for not remitting the case Claims - clarity (no) Reimbursement of appeal fee - (no) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
Although the board is prepared, in principle, to consider in exceptional circumstances the holding of ex parte oral proceedings by video conference, for the reasons set out in point 1.2.5 the conditions are not met in the present case. Moreover a party's right to be heard under Article 113(1) EPC does not imply a separate right of the party's representative to be heard and therefore does not imply a right to have oral proceedings before the EPO held by video conference (see point 1.3.18). |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t142068eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021