| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2016:T097111.20160304 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 04 March 2016 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0971/11 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 02722834.5 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B29C 61/02 B29C 55/02 C08J 5/18 B29C 47/10 B29B 7/30 B29B 7/58 B29B 11/00 B29B 13/10 C08L 67/02 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Heat-shrinkable polyester film roll and process for producing the same | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Toyobo Co., Ltd. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Klöckner Pentaplast GmbH | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.05 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Late-filed evidence - re-submitted with the statement of grounds of appeal (admitted) Public prior use (evidence insufficient) Novelty (yes) Inventive step (yes) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
Discretion of a board of appeal to admit a document which was not admitted in the first-instance proceedings (see points 1.3 and 1.4) |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: | |||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t110971eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021