European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2016:T055613.20161014 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 14 October 2016 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0556/13 | ||||||||
Application number: | 98906460.5 | ||||||||
IPC class: | G01F 1/84 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | C | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | CORIOLIS FLOWMETER HAVING AXIALLY COMPLIANT CASE ENDS | ||||||||
Applicant name: | MICRO MOTION INCORPORATED | ||||||||
Opponent name: | ENDRESS + Hauser (Deutschland) AG+Co.KG |
||||||||
Board: | 3.4.02 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
Keywords: | Main request - novelty (no) Auxiliary request 1 - request identical to request not admitted in first-instance proceedings - exceptionally admitted Auxiliary request 1 - amendments - added subject-matter (yes) Auxiliary request 2 - amendments - extension of protection (no) Auxiliary request 2 - correction of error - immediately evident that nothing else could have been intended (yes) Auxiliary request 2 - amendments - added subject-matter (yes) Auxiliary request 3 - sufficiency of disclosure (yes) Auxiliary request 3 - novelty (yes) Auxiliary request 3 - inventive step (yes) |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
Discretion of a board of appeal to admit a request which was not admitted in the first-instance proceedings (see point 2.1) |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t130556eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
24 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPC Articles
EPC Implementing Rules
Offical Journal of the EPO
Case Law Book: II Conditions to be met by an Application
XCLR II E 4.3 Correction of errors in the description, claims and drawings after grant, and in opposition proceedings