| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2011:T196908.20110607 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 07 June 2011 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1969/08 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 02771991.3 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | G06F 3/033 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | A touch control display screen with a built-in electromagnet induction layer of septum array grids | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Taiguen Technology (Shen_zhen) Co., Ltd., et al | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.5.05 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Sole request filed after summons for oral proceedings returns to subjet-matter abandoned during first-instance proceedings Non-attendance at oral proceedings Diverging request prima facie clearly allowable (no) Sole request admissible (no) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
If a feature objected to as "obscure" by the examining division and omitted from all requests subsequently filed by the applicant is then re-introduced in the claims filed one month before oral proceedings during the appeal proceedings without commenting on the objection raised earlier against this feature, the board may refuse to admit these claims into the proceedings at its discretion under Article 12(4) RPBA. |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t081969eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021