W 0006/90 (Single general concept) of 19.12.1990

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:1990:W000690.19901219
Date of decision: 19 December 1990
Case number: W 0006/90
Application number: -
IPC class: A61F 2/36
A61F 2/46
Language of proceedings: DE
Distribution:
Download and more information:
No PDF available
-
Bibliographic information is available in: DE | EN | FR
Versions: OJ
Title of application: -
Applicant name: Draenert
Opponent name: -
Board: 3.2.02
Headnote: 1. A single general concept within the meaning of Rule 13.1 PCT manifests itself in features common to different teachings expounded individually in the same application. It must, however, be borne in mind that such a teaching encompasses not only the immediate subject-matter representing the solution to the problem as defined in the relevant claim but also its technical consequences which are expressed as effects (see point 3.2 paragraph 2 of the Reasons for the Decision).
2. A single general concept may therefore be said to be present only if a partial identity exists among the teachings in an application deriving from the structural features of the subject- matters claimed and/or the outcome or results associated with those subject-matters (see point 3.2 paragraph 3 of the Reasons for the Decision).
3. For the purposes of unity of invention, Rule 13.1 PCT also stipulates that the single general concept must be inventive. Even with a given single general concept there is lack of unity if the concept has no inventive character. Before issuing an invitation to pay an additional search fee on the basis of lack of unity, the search examiner must accordingly demonstrate that, given the general knowledge of the person skilled in the art ("a priori") or the state of the art - as revealed by the search - relating to the subject-matter first defined in the claims ("a posteriori"), the substance of the single general concept can evidently contribute nothing to the inventive step (see point 3.3 paragraphs 1 and 3 of the Reasons for the Decision).
Relevant legal provisions:
Patent Cooperation Treaty Art 17(3)(a)
Patent Cooperation Treaty R 13(1)
Patent Cooperation Treaty R 40
Keywords: A priori absence of unity
Single general concept not inventive
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
-
Citing decisions:
T 0249/89
T 0188/04
W 0008/93
W 0001/96
W 0006/97
W 0004/98
W 0006/98
W 0009/99
W 0015/99
W 0009/00
W 0022/00
W 0016/01
W 0023/01
W 0005/02
W 0019/02
W 0009/03
W 0010/04
W 0023/04
W 0026/04
W 0028/06
W 0013/08
W 0020/08
W 0030/08
W 0036/08
W 0039/08
W 0041/08
W 0002/09
W 0004/09
W 0009/09

17 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

PCT Articles

PCT Implementing Rules

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: II Conditions to be met by an Application

General Case Law