T 0843/91 (Photographic elements) of 5.8.1993

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:1993:T084391.19930805
Date of decision: 05 August 1993
Case number: T 0843/91
Application number: 82306197.3
IPC class: G03C 7/32
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: A
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 1 MB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: OJ | OJ v2 | Published | Published v2
Title of application: Photographic elements containing aryloxy substituted photographic material
Applicant name: Kodak
Opponent name: Fuji
Board: 3.3.01
Headnote: A decision remitting a case to the Opposition Division with the order to maintain a patent on the basis of amended claims is binding in the sense that neither the wording nor the patentability of these claims may be further challenged in subsequent proceedings before the EPO. A finding of fact upon which this decision rests, i.e. a finding which is conditio sine qua non for the decision, is equally binding. Such a finding of fact is therefore not open to reconsideration pursuant to Article 111(2) EPC (point 3.4.2 of the Reasons).
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 133
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 134
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 106
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 111(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 111(2)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 112(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 125
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 104
European Patent Convention 1973 R 9
European Patent Convention 1973 R 10
Keywords: Unauthorised representative (no)
Letter critisising appeal proceedings not added to the opposition file after remittal (no substantial procedural violation)
Binding effect of Board of Appeal decisions (res iudicata; ratio decidendi)
Desirability of ending legal disputes (vexatious proceedings)
Revision of a Board of Appeal decision in application of Art. 125 EPC not decisive in the present case; insufficient evidence of generally accepted practice in all Contracting States)
Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (no)
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
-
Citing decisions:
G 0001/97
G 0001/05
J 0011/94
J 0003/95
J 0008/98
T 0690/91
T 0153/93
T 0167/93
T 0720/93
T 0027/94
T 0609/94
T 0460/95
T 0450/97
T 0241/98
T 0546/98
T 0954/98
T 0598/01
T 0694/01
T 0281/03
T 0609/03
T 1020/06
T 1895/06
T 0365/09
T 1518/11
T 2084/11
T 2297/11
T 0308/14
T 1257/14
T 0449/15
T 0602/18

32 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: III Amendments

Case Law Book: V Priority

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

General Case Law