| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1989:T013987.19890109 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 09 January 1989 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0139/87 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 83400619.9 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B60T 13/14 F15B 13/02 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | FR | ||||||||
| Distribution: | |||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Bendix | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | 1. An appeal by an applicant for a European patent is to be considered well founded within the meaning of Article 109(1) EPC if simultaneously amendments to the application are submitted which clearly meet the objections on which the contested decision relies. 2. In this case, the department that issued the contested decision must rectify that decision (contrary to the Guidelines E-XI,7). Irregularities other than those that gave rise to the contested decision do not preclude rectification of the decision. |
||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Interlocutory revision | ||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: | |||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t870139ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
34 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPO Guidelines - E General Procedural Matters
Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)