| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1993:T109792.19930927 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 27 September 1993 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1097/92 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 87201440.2 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C08F 2/44 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Process of (co)polymerization of alpha-olefins in the presence of stabilizers | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Enichem Synthesis S.p.A. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Interlocutory revision/ENICHEM | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.03 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Binding character of one-month term and prohibition of comment by Art. 109(2), but not of exclusion of telephone contact with applicant stipulated by Guidelines Interlocutory revision - remittal to the Board of Appeal Interlocutory revision - circumstances giving rise to Amendments - agreed by the Boards of Appeal Decision re appeal - remittal (yes) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
The one-month term stipulated by Article 109(2) has to be strictly adhered to. In certain situations, a telephone contact with the Appellant during the term available for any interlocutory revision may be appropriate and indeed helpful. If such a telephone contact is held, however it should not be recorded in writing in such a way as to constitute a comment on the merits of the appeal. |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t921097eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021