European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2010:T163509.20101027 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 27 October 2010 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 1635/09 | ||||||||
Application number: | 95905574.0 | ||||||||
IPC class: | A61K 31/57 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | DE | ||||||||
Distribution: | A | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | - | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Bayer Schering Pharma Aktiengesellschaft | ||||||||
Opponent name: | STRAGEN PHARMA SA Laboratorios Léon Farma, S.A. Sandoz AG Helm AG |
||||||||
Board: | 3.3.02 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Main request, auxiliary requests 1, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 19, 21, 22: therapeutic method  (yes): prevention or reduction of pathological side-effects Auxiliary requests 2, 3, 6, 9, 10, 13: sufficient disclosure  (no): invention cannot be carried out over the entire scope claimed; undue burden Auxiliary requests 16, 17, 20: sufficient disclosure  (no): undue burden Auxiliary request 23: extension of protection  (yes): conversion of use claim into ÂSwiss-type' claim Auxiliary request 24: extension of protection  (yes): conversion of use claim into purpose-related product claim |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
I. Use as an oral contraceptive of a composition in which the claimed concentrations of the hormone content are selected at such a low level as to prevent or reduce the likely pathological side-effects of such an oral contraceptive is a therapeutic method excluded from patentability under Article 53(c) EPC. II. Since the question whether or not a claimed use is therapeutic can be determined only in the light of the activities carried out and/or the effects achieved in the course of that use, the exclusion from patentability under Article 53(c) EPC of a therapeutic use in which a non-therapeutic use in the form of a contraceptive is inseparably associated with a therapeutic use in the form of the prevention or reduction of pathological side-effects cannot be removed by limiting the claim to a "non-therapeutic use". III. The conversion of a claim for the use of a substance or composition for a specific purpose into a Swiss-type claim or a purpose-related product claim within the meaning of Article 54(5) EPC results in an extension of protection. IV. In assessing the reasonableness of any series of tests needed to reproduce an invention, account must also be taken of their avoidability. Time-consuming and ethically questionable tests are unreasonable if the claimed invention could have been defined, without any limitation of its scope, by features which would have rendered such series of tests superfluous for the purpose of reproducibility by the skilled person. |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t091635ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021