| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2012:T254210.20121009 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 09 October 2012 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 2542/10 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 02738956.8 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | A23J 3/14 A23J 1/16 A23J 1/00 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | A method for improving a protein product | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Coöperatie AVEBE U.A. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Emsland-Stärke GmbH | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.09 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Admissibility of late-filed documents Admissibility of late-filed objection - no Novelty - no (main request), yes (Auxiliary Claim Request IA) Sufficiency of disclosure - yes (Auxiliary Claim Request IA) Inventive step - yes (Auxiliary Claim Request IA) Objection under Rule 106 EPC - dismissed |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
Admittance of documents filed late in appeal proceedings - relevance criterion (yes: point 2.2; no: points 2.3 and 2.4) |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t102542eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
