European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2012:T047609.20120921 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 21 September 2012 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0476/09 | ||||||||
Application number: | 03014697.1 | ||||||||
IPC class: | G03G 9/08 G03G 9/087 |
||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | D | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | Toner for developing latent electrostatic image, container having the same, developer using the same, process for developing using the same, image-forming process using the same, image-forming apparatus using the same, and image-forming process cartridge using the same | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | ||||||||
Opponent name: | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | ||||||||
Board: | 3.3.09 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Admissibility of requests filed with grounds of appeal - yes Admissibility of fresh documents - yes Remittal - no Priority - no, all requests Main request and auxiliary requests 1 and 2 - novelty - yes; inventive step - no Auxiliary request 3 - inventive step - yes Objection under Rule 106 EPC - dismissed |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t090476eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
20 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPC Articles
EPC Implementing Rules
Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO 2016, A87 - Interlocutory decision of Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.06 dated 17 July 2015 - T 557/13
Case Law Book: II Conditions to be met by an Application
XCLR II D 5.3.1 Development of the case law after G 2/98 in respect of generically formulated "OR" claims