| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1996:T044193.19960327 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 27 March 1996 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0441/93 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 83200714.0 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C12N 15/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Cloning system for Kluyveromyces species | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | GIST-BROCADES N.V. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | RHONE-POULENC SANTE | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.04 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Priority (no) - multiple priorities for one claim Novelty (yes) Inventive step (yes) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
If the Board concludes that a person skilled in the art would expect to have to perform scientific research rather than routine work in order to transfer a technology previously set up in one field of research to a neighbouring field, then inventive step may be acknowledged. |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t930441eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
10 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO 2016, A87 - Interlocutory decision of Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.06 dated 17 July 2015 - T 557/13